Javier Garcia Gil vs Manel Riera Danes
2017 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation, Benoni Defense (E74).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Javier Garcia Gil vs Manel Riera Danes with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Javier Garcia Gil (2162)
- Black
- Manel Riera Danes (1919)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation, Benoni Defense (E74)
About this chess game
This chess game between Javier Garcia Gil (2162) and Manel Riera Danes (1919) was played in 2017 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation, Benoni Defense (E74). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Javier Garcia Gil games or Manel Riera Danes games? This Javier Garcia Gil vs Manel Riera Danes encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation, Benoni Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Javier Garcia Gil vs Manel Riera Danes?
Javier Garcia Gil vs Manel Riera Danes (2017) finished 1–0, a win for Javier Garcia Gil.
What opening was played in Javier Garcia Gil vs Manel Riera Danes?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation, Benoni Defense (ECO E74).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Javier Garcia Gil vs Manel Riera Danes, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.