Lorenzo Garcia Galeote vs Samuel Rubio Popoteur
2019 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D05).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Lorenzo Garcia Galeote vs Samuel Rubio Popoteur with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Lorenzo Garcia Galeote (1809)
- Black
- Samuel Rubio Popoteur (1371)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D05)
About this chess game
This chess game between Lorenzo Garcia Galeote (1809) and Samuel Rubio Popoteur (1371) was played in 2019 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D05). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Lorenzo Garcia Galeote games or Samuel Rubio Popoteur games? This Lorenzo Garcia Galeote vs Samuel Rubio Popoteur encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Lorenzo Garcia Galeote vs Samuel Rubio Popoteur?
Lorenzo Garcia Galeote vs Samuel Rubio Popoteur (2019) finished 1–0, a win for Lorenzo Garcia Galeote.
What opening was played in Lorenzo Garcia Galeote vs Samuel Rubio Popoteur?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (ECO D05).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Lorenzo Garcia Galeote vs Samuel Rubio Popoteur, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.