Ignacio Garcia Esteban vs Luis Rodriguez Bachiller
2019 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: French Variation (B40).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ignacio Garcia Esteban vs Luis Rodriguez Bachiller with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ignacio Garcia Esteban (1807)
- Black
- Luis Rodriguez Bachiller (1613)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: French Variation (B40)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ignacio Garcia Esteban (1807) and Luis Rodriguez Bachiller (1613) was played in 2019 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: French Variation (B40). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ignacio Garcia Esteban games or Luis Rodriguez Bachiller games? This Ignacio Garcia Esteban vs Luis Rodriguez Bachiller encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: French Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ignacio Garcia Esteban vs Luis Rodriguez Bachiller?
Ignacio Garcia Esteban vs Luis Rodriguez Bachiller (2019) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Ignacio Garcia Esteban vs Luis Rodriguez Bachiller?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: French Variation (ECO B40).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ignacio Garcia Esteban vs Luis Rodriguez Bachiller, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.