Jordi Garcia Busquets vs Oscar Nahuel Roqueta Maffei
2019 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (B30).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jordi Garcia Busquets vs Oscar Nahuel Roqueta Maffei with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jordi Garcia Busquets (1965)
- Black
- Oscar Nahuel Roqueta Maffei (1683)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (B30)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jordi Garcia Busquets (1965) and Oscar Nahuel Roqueta Maffei (1683) was played in 2019 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (B30). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jordi Garcia Busquets games or Oscar Nahuel Roqueta Maffei games? This Jordi Garcia Busquets vs Oscar Nahuel Roqueta Maffei encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jordi Garcia Busquets vs Oscar Nahuel Roqueta Maffei?
Jordi Garcia Busquets vs Oscar Nahuel Roqueta Maffei (2019) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Jordi Garcia Busquets vs Oscar Nahuel Roqueta Maffei?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (ECO B30).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jordi Garcia Busquets vs Oscar Nahuel Roqueta Maffei, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.