Bogdan Garbea vs Jose Muelas Cerezuela
2009 · Result ½–½ · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Schlechter Defense (E52).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Bogdan Garbea vs Jose Muelas Cerezuela with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Bogdan Garbea (2254)
- Black
- Jose Muelas Cerezuela (2087)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Schlechter Defense (E52)
About this chess game
This chess game between Bogdan Garbea (2254) and Jose Muelas Cerezuela (2087) was played in 2009 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Schlechter Defense (E52). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Bogdan Garbea games or Jose Muelas Cerezuela games? This Bogdan Garbea vs Jose Muelas Cerezuela encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Schlechter Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Bogdan Garbea vs Jose Muelas Cerezuela?
Bogdan Garbea vs Jose Muelas Cerezuela (2009) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Bogdan Garbea vs Jose Muelas Cerezuela?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Schlechter Defense (ECO E52).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Bogdan Garbea vs Jose Muelas Cerezuela, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.