Nona Gaprindashvili vs John Zachariassen
16. ch-Euro Seniors +65, 2016 · Result 1–0 · Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (A42).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Nona Gaprindashvili vs John Zachariassen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Nona Gaprindashvili (2016)
- Black
- John Zachariassen (1956)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 16. ch-Euro Seniors +65
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (A42)
About this chess game
This chess game between Nona Gaprindashvili (2016) and John Zachariassen (1956) was played at 16. ch-Euro Seniors +65 in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (A42). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Nona Gaprindashvili games or John Zachariassen games? This Nona Gaprindashvili vs John Zachariassen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Nona Gaprindashvili vs John Zachariassen?
Nona Gaprindashvili vs John Zachariassen (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Nona Gaprindashvili.
What opening was played in Nona Gaprindashvili vs John Zachariassen?
The game opened with the Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (ECO A42).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Nona Gaprindashvili vs John Zachariassen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.