Zigen Gao vs Jiewen Xiao
Chinese Youth Championships 2026 | Boys U20, 2026 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Ragozin Variation (E51).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Zigen Gao vs Jiewen Xiao with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Zigen Gao (1769)
- Black
- Jiewen Xiao (2045)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Chinese Youth Championships 2026 | Boys U20
- Year
- 2026
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Ragozin Variation (E51)
About this chess game
This chess game between Zigen Gao (1769) and Jiewen Xiao (2045) was played at Chinese Youth Championships 2026 | Boys U20 in 2026 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Ragozin Variation (E51). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Zigen Gao games or Jiewen Xiao games? This Zigen Gao vs Jiewen Xiao encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Ragozin Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Zigen Gao vs Jiewen Xiao?
Zigen Gao vs Jiewen Xiao (2026) finished 0–1, a win for Jiewen Xiao.
What opening was played in Zigen Gao vs Jiewen Xiao?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Ragozin Variation (ECO E51).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Zigen Gao vs Jiewen Xiao, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.