Aleksei Gantsevich vs Dmitry Gantsevich
2012 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Aleksei Gantsevich vs Dmitry Gantsevich with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Aleksei Gantsevich (2024)
- Black
- Dmitry Gantsevich (1569)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92)
About this chess game
This chess game between Aleksei Gantsevich (2024) and Dmitry Gantsevich (1569) was played in 2012 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Aleksei Gantsevich games or Dmitry Gantsevich games? This Aleksei Gantsevich vs Dmitry Gantsevich encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Aleksei Gantsevich vs Dmitry Gantsevich?
Aleksei Gantsevich vs Dmitry Gantsevich (2012) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Aleksei Gantsevich vs Dmitry Gantsevich?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (ECO B92).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Aleksei Gantsevich vs Dmitry Gantsevich, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.