Salvatore Gangemi vs Alessandro Monaco
2009 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation (A38).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Salvatore Gangemi vs Alessandro Monaco with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Salvatore Gangemi (2105)
- Black
- Alessandro Monaco (1805)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation (A38)
About this chess game
This chess game between Salvatore Gangemi (2105) and Alessandro Monaco (1805) was played in 2009 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation (A38). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Salvatore Gangemi games or Alessandro Monaco games? This Salvatore Gangemi vs Alessandro Monaco encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Salvatore Gangemi vs Alessandro Monaco?
Salvatore Gangemi vs Alessandro Monaco (2009) finished 1–0, a win for Salvatore Gangemi.
What opening was played in Salvatore Gangemi vs Alessandro Monaco?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Duchamp Variation (ECO A38).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Salvatore Gangemi vs Alessandro Monaco, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.