Salvatore Gangemi vs Franco Furnari
2011 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Carlsbad Variation (E62).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Salvatore Gangemi vs Franco Furnari with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Salvatore Gangemi (2096)
- Black
- Franco Furnari (1942)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Carlsbad Variation (E62)
About this chess game
This chess game between Salvatore Gangemi (2096) and Franco Furnari (1942) was played in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Carlsbad Variation (E62). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Salvatore Gangemi games or Franco Furnari games? This Salvatore Gangemi vs Franco Furnari encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Carlsbad Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Salvatore Gangemi vs Franco Furnari?
Salvatore Gangemi vs Franco Furnari (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Salvatore Gangemi.
What opening was played in Salvatore Gangemi vs Franco Furnari?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Carlsbad Variation (ECO E62).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Salvatore Gangemi vs Franco Furnari, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.