Shankar Ganesh vs Teddy Coleman
9. North American Inv, 2008 · Result ½–½ · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E36).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Shankar Ganesh vs Teddy Coleman with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Shankar Ganesh (1266)
- Black
- Teddy Coleman (2243)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 9. North American Inv
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E36)
About this chess game
This chess game between Shankar Ganesh (1266) and Teddy Coleman (2243) was played at 9. North American Inv in 2008 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E36). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Shankar Ganesh games or Teddy Coleman games? This Shankar Ganesh vs Teddy Coleman encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Shankar Ganesh vs Teddy Coleman?
Shankar Ganesh vs Teddy Coleman (2008) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Shankar Ganesh vs Teddy Coleman?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (ECO E36).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Shankar Ganesh vs Teddy Coleman, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.