Attilio Gandolfi vs Davide Contini
Corr, date unknown · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation (B68).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Attilio Gandolfi vs Davide Contini with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Attilio Gandolfi (1733)
- Black
- Davide Contini (2236)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Corr
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation (B68)
About this chess game
This chess game between Attilio Gandolfi (1733) and Davide Contini (2236) was played at Corr and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation (B68). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Attilio Gandolfi games or Davide Contini games? This Attilio Gandolfi vs Davide Contini encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Attilio Gandolfi vs Davide Contini?
Attilio Gandolfi vs Davide Contini finished 0–1, a win for Davide Contini.
What opening was played in Attilio Gandolfi vs Davide Contini?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation (ECO B68).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Attilio Gandolfi vs Davide Contini, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.