Antonio Ganboa vs Fernando Savinell
date unknown · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit (B73).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Antonio Ganboa vs Fernando Savinell with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Antonio Ganboa
- Black
- Fernando Savinell (2075)
- Result
- ½–½
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit (B73)
About this chess game
This chess game between Antonio Ganboa and Fernando Savinell (2075) was played and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit (B73). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Antonio Ganboa games or Fernando Savinell games? This Antonio Ganboa vs Fernando Savinell encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Antonio Ganboa vs Fernando Savinell?
Antonio Ganboa vs Fernando Savinell finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Antonio Ganboa vs Fernando Savinell?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit (ECO B73).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Antonio Ganboa vs Fernando Savinell, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.