Alaa Gamal vs Philip Selikem Yao Amoako
FIDE World Bl Team Pool B, 2025 · Result 0–1 · Indian Defense: West Indian Defense (E60).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alaa Gamal vs Philip Selikem Yao Amoako with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alaa Gamal (1831)
- Black
- Philip Selikem Yao Amoako (1948)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- FIDE World Bl Team Pool B
- Year
- 2025
- Opening
- Indian Defense: West Indian Defense (E60)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alaa Gamal (1831) and Philip Selikem Yao Amoako (1948) was played at FIDE World Bl Team Pool B in 2025 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Indian Defense: West Indian Defense (E60). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alaa Gamal games or Philip Selikem Yao Amoako games? This Alaa Gamal vs Philip Selikem Yao Amoako encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Indian Defense: West Indian Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alaa Gamal vs Philip Selikem Yao Amoako?
Alaa Gamal vs Philip Selikem Yao Amoako (2025) finished 0–1, a win for Philip Selikem Yao Amoako.
What opening was played in Alaa Gamal vs Philip Selikem Yao Amoako?
The game opened with the Indian Defense: West Indian Defense (ECO E60).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alaa Gamal vs Philip Selikem Yao Amoako, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.