Alisa Galliamova vs Nadezhda Kosintseva
4. WGP Kazan 2012, 2012 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alisa Galliamova vs Nadezhda Kosintseva with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alisa Galliamova (2468)
- Black
- Nadezhda Kosintseva (2524)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 4. WGP Kazan 2012
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alisa Galliamova (2468) and Nadezhda Kosintseva (2524) was played at 4. WGP Kazan 2012 in 2012 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (E32). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alisa Galliamova games or Nadezhda Kosintseva games? This Alisa Galliamova vs Nadezhda Kosintseva encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alisa Galliamova vs Nadezhda Kosintseva?
Alisa Galliamova vs Nadezhda Kosintseva (2012) finished 0–1, a win for Nadezhda Kosintseva.
What opening was played in Alisa Galliamova vs Nadezhda Kosintseva?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation (ECO E32).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alisa Galliamova vs Nadezhda Kosintseva, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.