Salvador Jose Gallego de Aymerich vs Isaac Cabrera Martel
17. Montalvo Mem 2025, 2025 · Result 0–1 · Indian Defense (A45).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Salvador Jose Gallego de Aymerich vs Isaac Cabrera Martel with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- Black
- Isaac Cabrera Martel (1655)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 17. Montalvo Mem 2025
- Year
- 2025
- Opening
- Indian Defense (A45)
About this chess game
This chess game between Salvador Jose Gallego de Aymerich and Isaac Cabrera Martel (1655) was played at 17. Montalvo Mem 2025 in 2025 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Indian Defense (A45). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Salvador Jose Gallego de Aymerich games or Isaac Cabrera Martel games? This Salvador Jose Gallego de Aymerich vs Isaac Cabrera Martel encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Indian Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Salvador Jose Gallego de Aymerich vs Isaac Cabrera Martel?
Salvador Jose Gallego de Aymerich vs Isaac Cabrera Martel (2025) finished 0–1, a win for Isaac Cabrera Martel.
What opening was played in Salvador Jose Gallego de Aymerich vs Isaac Cabrera Martel?
The game opened with the Indian Defense (ECO A45).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Salvador Jose Gallego de Aymerich vs Isaac Cabrera Martel, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.