Marco Gallana vs Luigi Santolini
26. Venetian Autumn 2019, 2019 · Result 1–0 · Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation, Modern Variation (A90).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Marco Gallana vs Luigi Santolini with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Marco Gallana (2196)
- Black
- Luigi Santolini (2234)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 26. Venetian Autumn 2019
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation, Modern Variation (A90)
About this chess game
This chess game between Marco Gallana (2196) and Luigi Santolini (2234) was played at 26. Venetian Autumn 2019 in 2019 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation, Modern Variation (A90). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Marco Gallana games or Luigi Santolini games? This Marco Gallana vs Luigi Santolini encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation, Modern Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Marco Gallana vs Luigi Santolini?
Marco Gallana vs Luigi Santolini (2019) finished 1–0, a win for Marco Gallana.
What opening was played in Marco Gallana vs Luigi Santolini?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Stonewall Variation, Modern Variation (ECO A90).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Marco Gallana vs Luigi Santolini, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.