Mikhail Galiullin vs Radel Setyukov
2017 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation (E65).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mikhail Galiullin vs Radel Setyukov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mikhail Galiullin (2205)
- Black
- Radel Setyukov (1897)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation (E65)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mikhail Galiullin (2205) and Radel Setyukov (1897) was played in 2017 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation (E65). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mikhail Galiullin games or Radel Setyukov games? This Mikhail Galiullin vs Radel Setyukov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mikhail Galiullin vs Radel Setyukov?
Mikhail Galiullin vs Radel Setyukov (2017) finished 1–0, a win for Mikhail Galiullin.
What opening was played in Mikhail Galiullin vs Radel Setyukov?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation (ECO E65).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mikhail Galiullin vs Radel Setyukov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.