Francisco Galindo Rodriguez vs Vicente Mompo Ballester
Autonomico Team Ch, date unknown · Result ½–½ · King's Pawn Game (B00).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Francisco Galindo Rodriguez vs Vicente Mompo Ballester with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Francisco Galindo Rodriguez (2198)
- Black
- Vicente Mompo Ballester (2247)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Autonomico Team Ch
- Opening
- King's Pawn Game (B00)
About this chess game
This chess game between Francisco Galindo Rodriguez (2198) and Vicente Mompo Ballester (2247) was played at Autonomico Team Ch and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Pawn Game (B00). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Francisco Galindo Rodriguez games or Vicente Mompo Ballester games? This Francisco Galindo Rodriguez vs Vicente Mompo Ballester encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Pawn Game.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Francisco Galindo Rodriguez vs Vicente Mompo Ballester?
Francisco Galindo Rodriguez vs Vicente Mompo Ballester finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Francisco Galindo Rodriguez vs Vicente Mompo Ballester?
The game opened with the King's Pawn Game (ECO B00).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Francisco Galindo Rodriguez vs Vicente Mompo Ballester, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.