Marek Galewicz vs Bogdan Sliwa
Warchau ch POL, date unknown · Result ½–½ · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense, Exchange Line (E58).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Marek Galewicz vs Bogdan Sliwa with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Marek Galewicz
- Black
- Bogdan Sliwa
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Warchau ch POL
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense, Exchange Line (E58)
About this chess game
This chess game between Marek Galewicz and Bogdan Sliwa was played at Warchau ch POL and finished ½–½. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense, Exchange Line (E58). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Marek Galewicz games or Bogdan Sliwa games? This Marek Galewicz vs Bogdan Sliwa encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense, Exchange Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Marek Galewicz vs Bogdan Sliwa?
Marek Galewicz vs Bogdan Sliwa finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Marek Galewicz vs Bogdan Sliwa?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense, Exchange Line (ECO E58).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Marek Galewicz vs Bogdan Sliwa, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.