Omar Emilio Galeano Cabrales vs Guillermo Acevedo
2019 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation (B44).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Omar Emilio Galeano Cabrales vs Guillermo Acevedo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Omar Emilio Galeano Cabrales (1927)
- Black
- Guillermo Acevedo (1866)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation (B44)
About this chess game
This chess game between Omar Emilio Galeano Cabrales (1927) and Guillermo Acevedo (1866) was played in 2019 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation (B44). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Omar Emilio Galeano Cabrales games or Guillermo Acevedo games? This Omar Emilio Galeano Cabrales vs Guillermo Acevedo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Omar Emilio Galeano Cabrales vs Guillermo Acevedo?
Omar Emilio Galeano Cabrales vs Guillermo Acevedo (2019) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Omar Emilio Galeano Cabrales vs Guillermo Acevedo?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation (ECO B44).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Omar Emilio Galeano Cabrales vs Guillermo Acevedo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.