Sergey Galdunts vs Konstantin Tarlev
2015 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (B85).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Sergey Galdunts vs Konstantin Tarlev with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Sergey Galdunts (2420)
- Black
- Konstantin Tarlev (2551)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (B85)
About this chess game
This chess game between Sergey Galdunts (2420) and Konstantin Tarlev (2551) was played in 2015 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (B85). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Sergey Galdunts games or Konstantin Tarlev games? This Sergey Galdunts vs Konstantin Tarlev encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Sergey Galdunts vs Konstantin Tarlev?
Sergey Galdunts vs Konstantin Tarlev (2015) finished 0–1, a win for Konstantin Tarlev.
What opening was played in Sergey Galdunts vs Konstantin Tarlev?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (ECO B85).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Sergey Galdunts vs Konstantin Tarlev, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.