Fernando Galan Aguado vs Francisco Perez Carballeira
2012 · Result ½–½ · Slav Defense: Alapin Variation (D16).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Fernando Galan Aguado vs Francisco Perez Carballeira with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Fernando Galan Aguado (1769)
- Black
- Francisco Perez Carballeira (1609)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Alapin Variation (D16)
About this chess game
This chess game between Fernando Galan Aguado (1769) and Francisco Perez Carballeira (1609) was played in 2012 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Slav Defense: Alapin Variation (D16). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Fernando Galan Aguado games or Francisco Perez Carballeira games? This Fernando Galan Aguado vs Francisco Perez Carballeira encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Alapin Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Fernando Galan Aguado vs Francisco Perez Carballeira?
Fernando Galan Aguado vs Francisco Perez Carballeira (2012) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Fernando Galan Aguado vs Francisco Perez Carballeira?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Alapin Variation (ECO D16).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Fernando Galan Aguado vs Francisco Perez Carballeira, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.