Radoslaw Gajek vs Przemyslaw Bokiej
2009 · Result 0–1 · French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line (C06).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Radoslaw Gajek vs Przemyslaw Bokiej with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Radoslaw Gajek (1785)
- Black
- Przemyslaw Bokiej (2028)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line (C06)
About this chess game
This chess game between Radoslaw Gajek (1785) and Przemyslaw Bokiej (2028) was played in 2009 and finished 0–1. The opening was the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line (C06). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Radoslaw Gajek games or Przemyslaw Bokiej games? This Radoslaw Gajek vs Przemyslaw Bokiej encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Radoslaw Gajek vs Przemyslaw Bokiej?
Radoslaw Gajek vs Przemyslaw Bokiej (2009) finished 0–1, a win for Przemyslaw Bokiej.
What opening was played in Radoslaw Gajek vs Przemyslaw Bokiej?
The game opened with the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line (ECO C06).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Radoslaw Gajek vs Przemyslaw Bokiej, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.