Irwin Gaines vs Bob Stoltz
Fermi-Tyro, 2001 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Tartakower Defense, Makogonov Exchange Variation (D59).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Irwin Gaines vs Bob Stoltz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Irwin Gaines (1771)
- Black
- Bob Stoltz (1888)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Fermi-Tyro
- Year
- 2001
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Tartakower Defense, Makogonov Exchange Variation (D59)
About this chess game
This chess game between Irwin Gaines (1771) and Bob Stoltz (1888) was played at Fermi-Tyro in 2001 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Tartakower Defense, Makogonov Exchange Variation (D59). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Irwin Gaines games or Bob Stoltz games? This Irwin Gaines vs Bob Stoltz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Tartakower Defense, Makogonov Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Irwin Gaines vs Bob Stoltz?
Irwin Gaines vs Bob Stoltz (2001) finished 0–1, a win for Bob Stoltz.
What opening was played in Irwin Gaines vs Bob Stoltz?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Tartakower Defense, Makogonov Exchange Variation (ECO D59).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Irwin Gaines vs Bob Stoltz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.