Scarlett Gaillard vs Henri-Jean Lavergne
Val Maubuee Open, 1989 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Declined: Pillsbury Attack (D55).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Scarlett Gaillard vs Henri-Jean Lavergne with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Scarlett Gaillard (1780)
- Black
- Henri-Jean Lavergne (2119)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Val Maubuee Open
- Year
- 1989
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Pillsbury Attack (D55)
About this chess game
This chess game between Scarlett Gaillard (1780) and Henri-Jean Lavergne (2119) was played at Val Maubuee Open in 1989 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Pillsbury Attack (D55). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Scarlett Gaillard games or Henri-Jean Lavergne games? This Scarlett Gaillard vs Henri-Jean Lavergne encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Pillsbury Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Scarlett Gaillard vs Henri-Jean Lavergne?
Scarlett Gaillard vs Henri-Jean Lavergne (1989) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Scarlett Gaillard vs Henri-Jean Lavergne?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Pillsbury Attack (ECO D55).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Scarlett Gaillard vs Henri-Jean Lavergne, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.