Hans-Werner Gaebler vs Manfred Gensch
2009 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian (A21).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Hans-Werner Gaebler vs Manfred Gensch with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Hans-Werner Gaebler (1750)
- Black
- Manfred Gensch (1849)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian (A21)
About this chess game
This chess game between Hans-Werner Gaebler (1750) and Manfred Gensch (1849) was played in 2009 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian (A21). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Hans-Werner Gaebler games or Manfred Gensch games? This Hans-Werner Gaebler vs Manfred Gensch encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Hans-Werner Gaebler vs Manfred Gensch?
Hans-Werner Gaebler vs Manfred Gensch (2009) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Hans-Werner Gaebler vs Manfred Gensch?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian (ECO A21).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Hans-Werner Gaebler vs Manfred Gensch, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.