Guilherme Gaboleiro vs Fernando Luis Melao Pereira
2016 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (B21).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Guilherme Gaboleiro vs Fernando Luis Melao Pereira with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Guilherme Gaboleiro (1920)
- Black
- Fernando Luis Melao Pereira (2108)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (B21)
About this chess game
This chess game between Guilherme Gaboleiro (1920) and Fernando Luis Melao Pereira (2108) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (B21). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Guilherme Gaboleiro games or Fernando Luis Melao Pereira games? This Guilherme Gaboleiro vs Fernando Luis Melao Pereira encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Guilherme Gaboleiro vs Fernando Luis Melao Pereira?
Guilherme Gaboleiro vs Fernando Luis Melao Pereira (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Guilherme Gaboleiro vs Fernando Luis Melao Pereira?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (ECO B21).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Guilherme Gaboleiro vs Fernando Luis Melao Pereira, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.