Oleg Gabdullin vs Ivan Tipikin
2014 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System, Bernstein Defense (E56).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Oleg Gabdullin vs Ivan Tipikin with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Oleg Gabdullin (1874)
- Black
- Ivan Tipikin (1870)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System, Bernstein Defense (E56)
About this chess game
This chess game between Oleg Gabdullin (1874) and Ivan Tipikin (1870) was played in 2014 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System, Bernstein Defense (E56). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Oleg Gabdullin games or Ivan Tipikin games? This Oleg Gabdullin vs Ivan Tipikin encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System, Bernstein Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Oleg Gabdullin vs Ivan Tipikin?
Oleg Gabdullin vs Ivan Tipikin (2014) finished 0–1, a win for Ivan Tipikin.
What opening was played in Oleg Gabdullin vs Ivan Tipikin?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Gligoric System, Bernstein Defense (ECO E56).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Oleg Gabdullin vs Ivan Tipikin, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.