Michael Fugger vs Milan Martin T.
Landesliga Sued 9697 Bayern, date unknown · Result 0–1 · French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C16).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Michael Fugger vs Milan Martin T. with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Michael Fugger (1835)
- Black
- Milan Martin T. (2150)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Landesliga Sued 9697 Bayern
- Opening
- French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C16)
About this chess game
This chess game between Michael Fugger (1835) and Milan Martin T. (2150) was played at Landesliga Sued 9697 Bayern and finished 0–1. The opening was the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C16). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Michael Fugger games or Milan Martin T. games? This Michael Fugger vs Milan Martin T. encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Michael Fugger vs Milan Martin T.?
Michael Fugger vs Milan Martin T. finished 0–1, a win for Milan Martin T..
What opening was played in Michael Fugger vs Milan Martin T.?
The game opened with the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (ECO C16).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Michael Fugger vs Milan Martin T., or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.