Thomas Fuellgrabe vs Peter Broszeit
2016 · Result 1–0 · French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line (C06).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Thomas Fuellgrabe vs Peter Broszeit with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Thomas Fuellgrabe (2283)
- Black
- Peter Broszeit (1994)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line (C06)
About this chess game
This chess game between Thomas Fuellgrabe (2283) and Peter Broszeit (1994) was played in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line (C06). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Thomas Fuellgrabe games or Peter Broszeit games? This Thomas Fuellgrabe vs Peter Broszeit encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Thomas Fuellgrabe vs Peter Broszeit?
Thomas Fuellgrabe vs Peter Broszeit (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Thomas Fuellgrabe.
What opening was played in Thomas Fuellgrabe vs Peter Broszeit?
The game opened with the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line (ECO C06).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Thomas Fuellgrabe vs Peter Broszeit, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.