Ahmed Mufleh Fuad vs Hashem-Ali Haidar
2007 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Russian Gambit (D27).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ahmed Mufleh Fuad vs Hashem-Ali Haidar with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ahmed Mufleh Fuad (2147)
- Black
- Hashem-Ali Haidar (1908)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2007
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Russian Gambit (D27)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ahmed Mufleh Fuad (2147) and Hashem-Ali Haidar (1908) was played in 2007 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Russian Gambit (D27). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ahmed Mufleh Fuad games or Hashem-Ali Haidar games? This Ahmed Mufleh Fuad vs Hashem-Ali Haidar encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Russian Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ahmed Mufleh Fuad vs Hashem-Ali Haidar?
Ahmed Mufleh Fuad vs Hashem-Ali Haidar (2007) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Ahmed Mufleh Fuad vs Hashem-Ali Haidar?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Russian Gambit (ECO D27).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ahmed Mufleh Fuad vs Hashem-Ali Haidar, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.