Stefan Fröhlich vs Jonathan Chandler
GER-AUS/NZ 2015, 2015 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (B43).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Stefan Fröhlich vs Jonathan Chandler with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Stefan Fröhlich (1826)
- Black
- Jonathan Chandler (1832)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- GER-AUS/NZ 2015
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (B43)
About this chess game
This chess game between Stefan Fröhlich (1826) and Jonathan Chandler (1832) was played at GER-AUS/NZ 2015 in 2015 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (B43). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Stefan Fröhlich games or Jonathan Chandler games? This Stefan Fröhlich vs Jonathan Chandler encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Stefan Fröhlich vs Jonathan Chandler?
Stefan Fröhlich vs Jonathan Chandler (2015) finished 1–0, a win for Stefan Fröhlich.
What opening was played in Stefan Fröhlich vs Jonathan Chandler?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (ECO B43).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Stefan Fröhlich vs Jonathan Chandler, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.