Georg Froewis vs Guilherme Menezes Campos
AUT Ch, 2010 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line (B52).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Georg Froewis vs Guilherme Menezes Campos with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Georg Froewis (2279)
- Black
- Guilherme Menezes Campos (1528)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- AUT Ch
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line (B52)
About this chess game
This chess game between Georg Froewis (2279) and Guilherme Menezes Campos (1528) was played at AUT Ch in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line (B52). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Georg Froewis games or Guilherme Menezes Campos games? This Georg Froewis vs Guilherme Menezes Campos encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Georg Froewis vs Guilherme Menezes Campos?
Georg Froewis vs Guilherme Menezes Campos (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Georg Froewis vs Guilherme Menezes Campos?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line (ECO B52).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Georg Froewis vs Guilherme Menezes Campos, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.