Herbert Froehling vs Martin Pietzka
2007 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation (A17).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Herbert Froehling vs Martin Pietzka with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Herbert Froehling (1811)
- Black
- Martin Pietzka (1715)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2007
- Opening
- English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation (A17)
About this chess game
This chess game between Herbert Froehling (1811) and Martin Pietzka (1715) was played in 2007 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation (A17). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Herbert Froehling games or Martin Pietzka games? This Herbert Froehling vs Martin Pietzka encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Herbert Froehling vs Martin Pietzka?
Herbert Froehling vs Martin Pietzka (2007) finished 1–0, a win for Herbert Froehling.
What opening was played in Herbert Froehling vs Martin Pietzka?
The game opened with the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation (ECO A17).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Herbert Froehling vs Martin Pietzka, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.