Roland Fritz vs Gerhard Schoeler
Wattens Open 5th, 1990 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation (A39).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Roland Fritz vs Gerhard Schoeler with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Roland Fritz (2350)
- Black
- Gerhard Schoeler (2028)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Wattens Open 5th
- Year
- 1990
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation (A39)
About this chess game
This chess game between Roland Fritz (2350) and Gerhard Schoeler (2028) was played at Wattens Open 5th in 1990 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation (A39). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Roland Fritz games or Gerhard Schoeler games? This Roland Fritz vs Gerhard Schoeler encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Roland Fritz vs Gerhard Schoeler?
Roland Fritz vs Gerhard Schoeler (1990) finished 1–0, a win for Roland Fritz.
What opening was played in Roland Fritz vs Gerhard Schoeler?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Mecking Variation (ECO A39).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Roland Fritz vs Gerhard Schoeler, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.