Alfred Fricker vs Georges Vacca
FRA Ch 42nd, 1967 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation (A35).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alfred Fricker vs Georges Vacca with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alfred Fricker (1378)
- Black
- Georges Vacca (2129)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- FRA Ch 42nd
- Year
- 1967
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation (A35)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alfred Fricker (1378) and Georges Vacca (2129) was played at FRA Ch 42nd in 1967 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation (A35). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alfred Fricker games or Georges Vacca games? This Alfred Fricker vs Georges Vacca encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alfred Fricker vs Georges Vacca?
Alfred Fricker vs Georges Vacca (1967) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Alfred Fricker vs Georges Vacca?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Four Knights Variation (ECO A35).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alfred Fricker vs Georges Vacca, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.