Dominic Freyberg vs Stephan-Joerg, Dr. Hilbert
2017 · Result ½–½ · Bishop's Opening: Boden-Kieseritzky Gambit (C27).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Dominic Freyberg vs Stephan-Joerg, Dr. Hilbert with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Dominic Freyberg (2163)
- Black
- Stephan-Joerg, Dr. Hilbert (1822)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Bishop's Opening: Boden-Kieseritzky Gambit (C27)
About this chess game
This chess game between Dominic Freyberg (2163) and Stephan-Joerg, Dr. Hilbert (1822) was played in 2017 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Bishop's Opening: Boden-Kieseritzky Gambit (C27). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Dominic Freyberg games or Stephan-Joerg, Dr. Hilbert games? This Dominic Freyberg vs Stephan-Joerg, Dr. Hilbert encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Bishop's Opening: Boden-Kieseritzky Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Dominic Freyberg vs Stephan-Joerg, Dr. Hilbert?
Dominic Freyberg vs Stephan-Joerg, Dr. Hilbert (2017) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Dominic Freyberg vs Stephan-Joerg, Dr. Hilbert?
The game opened with the Bishop's Opening: Boden-Kieseritzky Gambit (ECO C27).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Dominic Freyberg vs Stephan-Joerg, Dr. Hilbert, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.