Giovanni Frassati vs Lodewyk Coqueraut
2013 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (B47).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Giovanni Frassati vs Lodewyk Coqueraut with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Giovanni Frassati (1818)
- Black
- Lodewyk Coqueraut (1813)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (B47)
About this chess game
This chess game between Giovanni Frassati (1818) and Lodewyk Coqueraut (1813) was played in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (B47). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Giovanni Frassati games or Lodewyk Coqueraut games? This Giovanni Frassati vs Lodewyk Coqueraut encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Giovanni Frassati vs Lodewyk Coqueraut?
Giovanni Frassati vs Lodewyk Coqueraut (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Giovanni Frassati.
What opening was played in Giovanni Frassati vs Lodewyk Coqueraut?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (ECO B47).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Giovanni Frassati vs Lodewyk Coqueraut, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.