Enric Franzoni Ladron de Guevara vs Hector Hernandez Funes
2016 · Result 0–1 · King's Pawn Game (B00).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Enric Franzoni Ladron de Guevara vs Hector Hernandez Funes with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Enric Franzoni Ladron de Guevara (1786)
- Black
- Hector Hernandez Funes (1940)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- King's Pawn Game (B00)
About this chess game
This chess game between Enric Franzoni Ladron de Guevara (1786) and Hector Hernandez Funes (1940) was played in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Pawn Game (B00). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Enric Franzoni Ladron de Guevara games or Hector Hernandez Funes games? This Enric Franzoni Ladron de Guevara vs Hector Hernandez Funes encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Pawn Game.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Enric Franzoni Ladron de Guevara vs Hector Hernandez Funes?
Enric Franzoni Ladron de Guevara vs Hector Hernandez Funes (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Hector Hernandez Funes.
What opening was played in Enric Franzoni Ladron de Guevara vs Hector Hernandez Funes?
The game opened with the King's Pawn Game (ECO B00).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Enric Franzoni Ladron de Guevara vs Hector Hernandez Funes, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.