Per-Erik Franzen vs Jakob Aabling-Thomsen
Politiken Cup 2012, 2012 · Result 0–1 · Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Per-Erik Franzen vs Jakob Aabling-Thomsen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Per-Erik Franzen (2040)
- Black
- Jakob Aabling-Thomsen (2341)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Politiken Cup 2012
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85)
About this chess game
This chess game between Per-Erik Franzen (2040) and Jakob Aabling-Thomsen (2341) was played at Politiken Cup 2012 in 2012 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Per-Erik Franzen games or Jakob Aabling-Thomsen games? This Per-Erik Franzen vs Jakob Aabling-Thomsen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Per-Erik Franzen vs Jakob Aabling-Thomsen?
Per-Erik Franzen vs Jakob Aabling-Thomsen (2012) finished 0–1, a win for Jakob Aabling-Thomsen.
What opening was played in Per-Erik Franzen vs Jakob Aabling-Thomsen?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (ECO D85).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Per-Erik Franzen vs Jakob Aabling-Thomsen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.