Christian Frank vs Viktor Ferdinand Soellig
BZM Ch U10/14, 2005 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29).
Analyze this game
Open Christian Frank vs Viktor Ferdinand Soellig on the CipherChess board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Open the Analysis BoardMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Christian Frank (1835)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- BZM Ch U10/14
- Year
- 2005
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29)
About this chess game
This chess game between Christian Frank (1835) and Viktor Ferdinand Soellig was played at BZM Ch U10/14 in 2005 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Christian Frank games or Viktor Ferdinand Soellig games? This Christian Frank vs Viktor Ferdinand Soellig encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Christian Frank vs Viktor Ferdinand Soellig?
Christian Frank vs Viktor Ferdinand Soellig (2005) finished 1–0, a win for Christian Frank.
What opening was played in Christian Frank vs Viktor Ferdinand Soellig?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (ECO A29).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Christian Frank vs Viktor Ferdinand Soellig, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.