Angela Franco Valencia vs Roberto Garcia Pantoja
2016 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Zagreb Variation (B91).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Angela Franco Valencia vs Roberto Garcia Pantoja with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Angela Franco Valencia (2236)
- Black
- Roberto Garcia Pantoja (2463)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Zagreb Variation (B91)
About this chess game
This chess game between Angela Franco Valencia (2236) and Roberto Garcia Pantoja (2463) was played in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Zagreb Variation (B91). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Angela Franco Valencia games or Roberto Garcia Pantoja games? This Angela Franco Valencia vs Roberto Garcia Pantoja encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Zagreb Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Angela Franco Valencia vs Roberto Garcia Pantoja?
Angela Franco Valencia vs Roberto Garcia Pantoja (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Roberto Garcia Pantoja.
What opening was played in Angela Franco Valencia vs Roberto Garcia Pantoja?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Zagreb Variation (ECO B91).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Angela Franco Valencia vs Roberto Garcia Pantoja, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.