Nicolas Forissier vs Guillaume Perrin
2010 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Deferred Fianchetto (E72).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Nicolas Forissier vs Guillaume Perrin with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Nicolas Forissier (1987)
- Black
- Guillaume Perrin (2323)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Deferred Fianchetto (E72)
About this chess game
This chess game between Nicolas Forissier (1987) and Guillaume Perrin (2323) was played in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Deferred Fianchetto (E72). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Nicolas Forissier games or Guillaume Perrin games? This Nicolas Forissier vs Guillaume Perrin encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Deferred Fianchetto.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Nicolas Forissier vs Guillaume Perrin?
Nicolas Forissier vs Guillaume Perrin (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Nicolas Forissier vs Guillaume Perrin?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Deferred Fianchetto (ECO E72).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Nicolas Forissier vs Guillaume Perrin, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.