Anthony Foreman vs Peter Klochán
DE10A /pr 78, 2016 · Result 0–1 · Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (D93).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Anthony Foreman vs Peter Klochán with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Anthony Foreman
- Black
- Peter Klochán (2331)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- DE10A /pr 78
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (D93)
About this chess game
This chess game between Anthony Foreman and Peter Klochán (2331) was played at DE10A /pr 78 in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (D93). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Anthony Foreman games or Peter Klochán games? This Anthony Foreman vs Peter Klochán encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Anthony Foreman vs Peter Klochán?
Anthony Foreman vs Peter Klochán (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Peter Klochán.
What opening was played in Anthony Foreman vs Peter Klochán?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (ECO D93).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Anthony Foreman vs Peter Klochán, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.