Guillermo J. Fontanez Torres vs Gabriel Pinales Roussel
2016 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Closed (B23).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Guillermo J. Fontanez Torres vs Gabriel Pinales Roussel with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Guillermo J. Fontanez Torres (2079)
- Black
- Gabriel Pinales Roussel (2025)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Closed (B23)
About this chess game
This chess game between Guillermo J. Fontanez Torres (2079) and Gabriel Pinales Roussel (2025) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Closed (B23). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Guillermo J. Fontanez Torres games or Gabriel Pinales Roussel games? This Guillermo J. Fontanez Torres vs Gabriel Pinales Roussel encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Closed.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Guillermo J. Fontanez Torres vs Gabriel Pinales Roussel?
Guillermo J. Fontanez Torres vs Gabriel Pinales Roussel (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Guillermo J. Fontanez Torres vs Gabriel Pinales Roussel?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Closed (ECO B23).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Guillermo J. Fontanez Torres vs Gabriel Pinales Roussel, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.