Ernesto Fonseca Cabrera vs Francisco Batres
ch-NCA 2011, 2011 · Result ½–½ · Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B19).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ernesto Fonseca Cabrera vs Francisco Batres with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ernesto Fonseca Cabrera (2091)
- Black
- Francisco Batres (2194)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- ch-NCA 2011
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B19)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ernesto Fonseca Cabrera (2091) and Francisco Batres (2194) was played at ch-NCA 2011 in 2011 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B19). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ernesto Fonseca Cabrera games or Francisco Batres games? This Ernesto Fonseca Cabrera vs Francisco Batres encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ernesto Fonseca Cabrera vs Francisco Batres?
Ernesto Fonseca Cabrera vs Francisco Batres (2011) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Ernesto Fonseca Cabrera vs Francisco Batres?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (ECO B19).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ernesto Fonseca Cabrera vs Francisco Batres, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.