Maksim Fominykh vs Tatiana Bogumil
WCh w Blitz Quarter-Final, 2010 · Result 1–0 · Benko Gambit Accepted: Fully Accepted Variation (A58).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Maksim Fominykh vs Tatiana Bogumil with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Maksim Fominykh (2305)
- Black
- Tatiana Bogumil (2096)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- WCh w Blitz Quarter-Final
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Benko Gambit Accepted: Fully Accepted Variation (A58)
About this chess game
This chess game between Maksim Fominykh (2305) and Tatiana Bogumil (2096) was played at WCh w Blitz Quarter-Final in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Benko Gambit Accepted: Fully Accepted Variation (A58). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Maksim Fominykh games or Tatiana Bogumil games? This Maksim Fominykh vs Tatiana Bogumil encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Benko Gambit Accepted: Fully Accepted Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Maksim Fominykh vs Tatiana Bogumil?
Maksim Fominykh vs Tatiana Bogumil (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Maksim Fominykh.
What opening was played in Maksim Fominykh vs Tatiana Bogumil?
The game opened with the Benko Gambit Accepted: Fully Accepted Variation (ECO A58).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Maksim Fominykh vs Tatiana Bogumil, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.