Günther Flitsch vs Morten Lilleren
WSTT/3/09/1, 2009 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Günther Flitsch vs Morten Lilleren with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Günther Flitsch (2304)
- Black
- Morten Lilleren (2577)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- WSTT/3/09/1
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81)
About this chess game
This chess game between Günther Flitsch (2304) and Morten Lilleren (2577) was played at WSTT/3/09/1 in 2009 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Günther Flitsch games or Morten Lilleren games? This Günther Flitsch vs Morten Lilleren encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Günther Flitsch vs Morten Lilleren?
Günther Flitsch vs Morten Lilleren (2009) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Günther Flitsch vs Morten Lilleren?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (ECO E81).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Günther Flitsch vs Morten Lilleren, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.