Peggy Flemming vs Eugen Roettinger
TCh-EUR Senior +50 2022, 2022 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Peggy Flemming vs Eugen Roettinger with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Peggy Flemming (1626)
- Black
- Eugen Roettinger (2000)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- TCh-EUR Senior +50 2022
- Year
- 2022
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37)
About this chess game
This chess game between Peggy Flemming (1626) and Eugen Roettinger (2000) was played at TCh-EUR Senior +50 2022 in 2022 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Peggy Flemming games or Eugen Roettinger games? This Peggy Flemming vs Eugen Roettinger encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Peggy Flemming vs Eugen Roettinger?
Peggy Flemming vs Eugen Roettinger (2022) finished 0–1, a win for Eugen Roettinger.
What opening was played in Peggy Flemming vs Eugen Roettinger?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (ECO D37).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Peggy Flemming vs Eugen Roettinger, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.